Phytagoric philosophy fr. 600 bc. - Tetraktys	Is the inner being of nature just...numbers?!!
	The great Greek mathematics Phytagoras one time said that number was the origin of nature. What did he mean by that Was the meaning poetical and meant like a metaphor? Or should the interpretation be directly literal?!! Is it really possible to even think of a literal interpretation? Yes, I will do that claim! The following article will give you a guide to a complete different way to look at the world we’re living in. By Anders Persson

Digital reality?

Chaos or order      We today living in a time where the technological development is almost explosive. If we look at the computer sector, then we can see that a two year old computer is almost worthless. Capacity we only could dream of for a couple of year is today a must.      In line of increasing capacity of the computers we also have a similar develop in software. One branch in the offer of software, and who also has been very popular, is program that simulating a 3D environment .      It can for example be program that simulating that you are walking in a department even before it has left the drawing table. It can also be a pure fantasy world where only the fantasy sets a limit. To increase the illusion the market is full of appendage such helmets with build in monitors for 3D effect and different types of clothes with sensors to detect body movements.      The tendency is clear; the software and hardware goes against a point where we maybe can have an illusion of to be in a "real" world. And the development goes fast!      Maybe we in a future can connect our brain directly to a server, where we like in the movie "Total Recal" can order a history where one of the actors is the own person.      Well, what will I tell you with this story? Well, just in the way that we can describe a "reality" or 3D environment in a computerprogram I think we also can describe our own world, who we see like a reality, in the same term. The opinion is built on the conclusion that all thing in the nature can describes in term of mathematic functions. Of course that means that we can’t have any influence of chance in the rulebook of nature. But that is not a problem for me thus I never thought that nature is playing with die when we come down to a fundamental level (and of course not in other cases either).

Virtual v/s Reality?

Hard and software      I further claimed that if we accept that our world can describes in way of mathematical functions, then we also can say that the world is just mathematical functions!    And as in the example with artificial or virtual reality it    depends on some sort of "hardware"-structure who     these functions can work within. In the case of computer      environment the structure is buildt by these integrated circuits      who execute the program. When it comes to our own world these     structures are just as alien and hard to catch as the integrated circuits are for the actors in a computerprogram. Looking from the        software-view, these integrated circuits must be like something who, to take a familiar expression, is in a other dimension. If these description of our reality is right, then it must be a another dimension who our world can work under. The fact is, if this is the case, then our picture of reality must be reverse from the ground.      One example of this is the problem with time cycles, who rise when material moved very quickly in relation to each other. The program must in every moment calculate position of each "particle" in relationship to other "particles" in the neighbourhood to prevent uncontrolled collisions and of course it must be a "limit" for how many calculations the program can do in each moment and with each "particles". The same rules must in that case be valid for different types of waves. Maybe it can give some understanding about limits of speed in the nature and behaviour according to that, special things who are connecting with speed in the range of light.

Without limits...      If we as an example look on the question of the greatness of our universe, a question who always run in to a debate of limit or not limit.      If we can accept these model of reality with mathematical functions, then I think our universe simply can’t be without limit. Because this depends, as I can understand, of the fact that we have to dealing with number who has value without limit, and that is inconceivable.      The value of the number can indeed be big...very big...but never without limit.      Unfortunately do this not solve the problem with the endless universe, we have only moved the problem to another dimension. That because we must calculate that these structure, who our universe work under, also work and exist under a similar structure, and that structure in his turn work under...and so on.

Michel de Nostradame (Year 1503-66) one of the cases we can wonder about...

To see the future      Try to see what the future have in mind is something we often do in front of a new year. To count for the future is not only something who benefit our chance to survival, but it’s almost necessary if you will live in a society like ours. It’s not any mysterious thing to draw conclusion about ongoing chain of event to predict future, based on earlier experience of similar chains.      However, some people claim that they can receive messages and information from the future by some kind of communication channel or similar. In other word, they claim that the information they got don’t depend on things they have calculating according to earlier knowledge but have receive finished and sometimes with details like in a movie. Pure nonsense? Yes, maybe.      If we look at it under a scientistic view, then we can’t say that the predicting security is on a high level, but I believe there do exists reports who is hard to explain.      Ether it is true or nonsense to "see" into the future There is of course a theoretical possibility to do so in a world built on mathematical functions. In that case we can imagine that something in the beginning has "started" several similar worlds with a time delay between each other. If we then imagine that it is some sort of communication channel between these worlds or dimensions then we also of course can receive information about our own world or dimension both back in time and forward in time. But can we depend on this information, can we be sure that the events are going to happen as it is predict? The problem is that in the same time we have receive the information, then we also has add a distortion in the chain of events in our own dimension. That is under the circumstantial that the dimension that have give us the information not have received a similar information from another dimension forward in time. Of course, we can also have the scenario that the dimension that give us the informaton, also have received a similar information from another dimension forward in time. In the first case, that we can called a primary distortion, we have a chance to change our destiny. But in last case, we can called it a secondary distortion, we can’t.      A good advise: If you ever gone to believe in this form of future prediction, and the prediction contain bad messages, then never despair, after all the information can be of a primary sort!

Are we visitors?

Are we visitors from another dimension!      To receive information from another dimension depends on the fact that we must have some sort of information channel between our brain and these other dimensions. We have no evidens of that, but this theory do open up many possibility’s, where even such things can be incorporated.      As a final I will give you a thought who has rise in associate with these subject.      If program, as I believe, in the range of long time, are develop to a level like in the movie "Total Recal" and we for example are going to book our holiday to a trip in these virtual reality, then maybe this reality, who we thought is real, only is a short trip in to a virtual reality from an other dimension above us!!!      And that was all!